Stage 1

Hypotheses for agencies and creative services

Agencies sell taste, and taste is hard to put in an email. How to write a misery hypothesis about the marketing problem instead of your portfolio.

Kevin French
· 3 min read

Agencies lose the first email by leading with the work. The reel, the awards, the logo wall. A CMO can't evaluate taste in an inbox, and she's seen a hundred reels this year.

Lead with her problem. The work comes later, once she's told you what's broken.

Why agency outreach sounds the same

Creative firms love what they make, and they should. But every agency's first touch reads alike. We help brands tell their story. We're a full service creative partner. Here's a case study for a company in your space.

None of it says anything about the buyer. And marketing leaders are flooded. Agencies, martech vendors, media sellers, freelancers. The inbox is a wall.

A hypothesis gets through the wall by being about her, not you.

Where agency misery lives

Marketing pain tends to show up in a few places. The in-house team is stretched thin and can't keep up with content demand. A rebrand launched and the business side quietly hates it. Performance is flat and the CFO wants proof that brand spend works. The agency of record has gone stale, and the client team is doing the thinking the agency should be doing.

New leaders feel this hardest. A new CMO has a short window to show a point of view, and the creative is the most visible thing she controls.

The signals to watch

The public record tells you a lot. A company entering a new market, launching a product line or raising money needs to say something new. Earnings releases and 10-Qs that mention flat demand or brand investment are worth reading. Job posts for in-house creative directors, content strategists or brand managers tell you where they're building and where they're short.

Social context is even richer in this category. Marketing leaders post constantly. Read what they write. A CMO posting about brand that earns attention is telling you her thesis. A director of brand who reshares a peer's post about agency fatigue is telling you something too.

And watch the market. A competitor's big campaign gets noticed. A peer brand that reinvented itself becomes the slide in someone's board deck.

An example opener

Say a consumer goods company just named a new CMO, and their latest earnings release mentions launching into a new category next year. Their careers page lists two senior in-house content roles.

You've arrived as CMO a few months before a new category launch, and the careers page says the in-house team is still hiring for it. My guess is the launch timeline assumes a creative engine you don't have yet, and the current agency is built for the old business, not the new one. Is that accurate, or is the gap somewhere else?

No reel. No award. Just a guess about her world that she can confirm or fix in one line.

Let the work follow

Once she corrects you, you've earned the right to show work. And now you can show the right work. If she says the real issue is that brand and performance teams don't talk, you send the one case where you fixed exactly that. Not the reel.

That's the order. Hypothesis, correction, then proof that fits what she told you. Agencies that flip it spend the first meeting presenting things the buyer didn't ask about.

Reach past the CMO

The CMO signs, but she isn't alone. A head of brand or a director of content is often the champion who'll live with the agency daily. A marketing operations or digital lead is the technical voice who cares about how assets move through their systems. Finance cares whether the spend ties to revenue.

Write each one a version. Same research, different misery. The content director's misery is volume and turnaround. The marketing ops lead's misery is assets arriving in formats the systems can't use. Finance's misery is proving return on a line item that's easy to cut.

Don't hide behind the brand voice

Agencies like to write outreach in their own house style. Clever, playful, full of attitude. It works on a website. In a cold note to a senior buyer, it reads like a stunt.

Write plainly. Save the craft for the work. A CMO who gets a short, specific, slightly wrong guess about her launch will write back faster than one who gets a witty riddle about storytelling.

For writing to the marketing leader in more depth, read selling to a CMO. The method has the full structure.

Your taste gets you the second meeting. The hypothesis gets you the first.

See which of your accounts are moving.

Stage 1 reads your site, finds accounts that fit and checks their filings and news. Your first Board in about two minutes. Free for 14 days, no credit card.